Proposal:Pornopedia

From Strategic Planning
Status (see valid statuses)

The status of this proposal is:
Request for Discussion / Sign-Ups

Every proposal should be tied to one of the strategic priorities below.

Edit this page to help identify the priorities related to this proposal!


  1. Achieve continued growth in readership
  2. Focus on quality content
  3. Increase Participation
  4. Stabilize and improve the infrastructure
  5. Encourage Innovation



If not English, in what language is this proposal submitted?:

Summary

The Wikimedia Foundation could create a project for free content pornography.

Proposal

  • A fitting domain name would be required. Pornopedia.org for example.
  • Setup a Wiki. Allow local uploads.

Motivation

  • Wikipedia articles on sexual subjects are among the most widely viewed across many languages.
  • Sexual images among the most widely viewed images on Wikimedia Commons.
  • An increasing density of explicitly sexual images on Commons and English Wikipedia and commons indicates a clear interest in this subject by editors.
  • Wiki(p|m)edia should be the sum of human knowledge, no? Sex is all some people seem to think about!

Key Questions

  • Should pornopedia exist in multiple languages or is porn the only practical universal language?
  • Should fetish classified sub-domains be used instead?
  • Is translatewiki.net prepared to translate the user interface into porn?
  • Will NPOV be a requirement for pornopedia?
  • Would this essay cause confusion if applied to pornopedia?
  • Should pornstar biographies be moved from Wikipedia to pornopedia?
  • How would you establish consent from all human participants and prevent people uploading personal photographs of former lovers without their exes permission?
  • How would you establish that all participants were legally adult at the time the photograph was taken or filming was done?

Potential Costs

  • Increased filtering from more conservative countries
  • Large bandwidth costs
  • Loss of goodwill by alienating people who find explicit pornography offensive
  • Compliance with (any) requirements from 18 U.S.C. § 2251

The last two costs must be tolerable considering that English Wikipedia and Wikimedia commons already contain ample amounts of sexually explicit material.

References



Community Discussion

Do you have a thought about this proposal? A suggestion? Discuss this proposal by going to Proposal Talk:Pornopedia.

Want to work on this proposal?

  1. .. Sign your name here!