Talk:Editing templates
From Strategic Planning
Should this page go under the Strategic Planning namespace? --Eekim 22:20, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not sure. The strategic planning namespace has tended to be very specific to program outcomes, while this is more of a "general wiki knowledge" thing. ~Philippe 22:45, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
- [History↑]
Contents
| Thread title | Replies | Last modified |
|---|---|---|
| Suggestions on tags | 0 | 00:17, 11 March 2010 |
| Moved to strategic planning namespace | 0 | 23:43, 10 March 2010 |
I reorganized this page according to content. There are some missing which we should add; stuff for user pages for example.
Overall, I think that the tags we have for now are good. The only one I might question is Historical. It's used on several of the Reach pages, but I'm not sure they apply.
Here's some usage analysis. Note that the numbers may be inflated due to translations and mentions in LiquidThreads discussions:
| Tag | Used | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| UnderConstruction | 1 | |
| Draft | 63 | |
| Historical | 11 | |
| Merge | 82 | Proposals |
| @ | 72 | Mostly translated calls for participation letter |
| NoLiquidThreads | 8 | All user pages |
| Social | 63 | Mostly proposals |
| Warning | 80 | User talk pages |
| ArchivedDone | 7 | Proposals |
| Notice | 138 | Lots of task force pages |
| Bugzilla | 19 | Mostly proposals |
| SectionNeedsWork | 2 | |
| Fact | 5 | |
| Import | 1 |
