Concrete priorities
Fragment of a discussion from Talk:Strategic Plan/Movement Priorities
How about adding a short section (to clarify a few points that may otherwise be taken out of context)? Example:
- === Corollaries ===
- A number of corollaries exist to make the above useful. These include:
- Knowledge is not necessarily the same as data - making available "the sum of all knowledge" has traditionally co-existed with recognizing the need for a degree of selectivity in the knowledge covered.
If we were going to add such a note, either as a short section or footnote, anything else important that would need saying?
No, that should be enough cause everything else is already mentioned (eg. quality)... so feel free to add it
I know we're getting into "what Wikipedia is not", which is a legitimate conversation with pretty widespread agreement. But I'd like to think we can frame quality and scope in more positive terms. I'm stumped though. If no one can come up with anything better, I think FT2 has offered a solid starting point.