Reduce Content Gaps and Improve Global Coverage

Yes but I still think my rewrite is better. Wikipedia is our flagship project and I don;t want to give the trolls any coer for their attacks on it.

I'm actually rather fond of the idea behind diverse viewpoints, but maybe it's not expressed well.

What we're looking for is this: we have gaps in our understanding of issues because of the fact that our editing base is largely not diverse - predominately educated young men from the global north. We're missing a diversity of ideas and thoughts on talk pages, for instance, that help us coalesce around a better understanding of topics. Perhaps "point of view" is the wrong verbiage, but I feel pretty strongly that the idea is correct. Can you help me phrase it better?

See my rewrite. I think it covers what you said - increase the participation of under represented groups to improve coverage of areas that are ot well covered at the mment.