A strong and dangerous limit in expanding Wikipedia (moved from front page)

A strong and dangerous limit in expanding Wikipedia may be found in the organized action of some national little groups. I know the situation in some European Wiki, outside the English language groups. They create little groups (five or ten members) in order to limit new entries through the use of a formal vote which use to cancel some items or impose their rules.^{{{citation needed}}} I propose (i) to fix in almost 100 or 150 votes any decision to cancel an item. I propose also (ii) to open a procedure for the revision of the items cancelled in the past. Louiseblaklake 20:33, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Louise

I moved your comment to the talk page as this is a more appropriate location for your comment.

Your comment is probably not going to get much discussion here either however unless you are a lot more specific. Which languages are you referring to? Can you give us a link to a specific discussion where you feel you were not treated fairly?

Please remember that these are encyclopedias and they have policies on what is and is not acceptable for inclusion. If they followed these policies then you are unlikely to get the decision reversed and you should consider contributing in a more appropriate venue.