Regarding your block of [[User:Vapmachado|Vapmachado]]

Fragment of a discussion from User talk:Theo10011
Edited by author.
Last edit: 09:18, 8 June 2011

Honestly, There wasn't that much of a thought that went into it. He wrote something creepy and abrasive that might or might not have had private info, but then added it as a subpage to the march update, giving the appearance that it was part of it. I found the references and the tone in the first 2 para before his suggestions - creepy and intimidating. He wasn't as active before that and has indef. blocks on several other wikis including Meta [1] for privacy issues among other concerns. At first, Indefinite Block might have seemed excessive, I agree and I would have re-considered, until he wrote his usual attack email to me. He did not request an unblock from me, until he either does that or apologizes for his tone in the email, I refuse to reconsider. There Is no sense in applying en.wp guidelines here, strategy wiki is not active, it has opted in for for GS under SWMT [2] and his x-wiki history can be a factor.

Theo1001108:05, 8 June 2011

As for his 'open letter', I still find it quiet creepy and harassing. He's using references to PO boxes, and is being generally creepy in the second paragraph.

Theo1001109:08, 8 June 2011

Hmm, okay. Fair enough. I think it's reasonable that he apologize and make assurances to not repeat his problematic behavior, particularly given his cross-wiki issues.

I'll say that the fact that this wiki is not active is all the more reason that what people do here generally doesn't matter, unless it's particularly harmful. That is, there isn't much to disrupt, so the threshold for indefinite blocks should be higher, not lower, in my opinion.

Thanks for the quick reply!

MZMcBride22:14, 8 June 2011