Page status template

Can someone change this template to an Infobox?

Issues:

• It's Useless (Philippe: It is actually not useless.... there are a number of things dependent upon it.)
• It's Ugly
• hard to fill or edit (resolved. Thanks)
• Always takes about 40% of page. Unlike info-box.
• When the forth parameter is turned on, the forth priority turns into a long sentence:

"Ensure that the underlying project infrastructure is secure, stable, and sufficient to guarantee the permanence of the projects and support ongoing growth".

• The current statements are not so clear.

Like: focus on quality conent. if the proposal ssatisfies two priorities, it's not a "focus".

• There is no link to give a separate understanding. all linke go to movement priorities.

Like: there is no good link to what quality content is. does it mean featured and good articles, books, ...? I studied for 30 hours (most interviews, case studies, illustrations, theory of change, articles in "quality part of wikimedia-pedia) to find out what that is. people have really different opinions.

• When in the page, pictures for first paragraph behave bad:

The thumbnails and non thumbnails push the table of content forward, instead of pushing it down. like: here

The right aligned pictures like [[File:Example.jpg|left|75px]] falls over the table of contents!

It is actually not useless.... there are a number of things dependent upon it. I'm sorry you're having problems with it... do you have some usability suggestions?

Suggestions: I've drawn a better one. I tried to edit the template (2.5 hours honestly), but those codes are so hard to understand and edit. gotta go. I'll answer later.

It's a good one. but I have a side-box here

Benefits

• everyone will like it
• colored background! blue is cool
• narrow width
• not as long as it looks here.

My suggestion:

title
------------------
|                |
|                |
|   Picture      |
|                |
|                |
------------------
caption

Strategy:
 {{strategic priorities
  | status =
  | Infrastructure = no
  | Reach = no
  | Quality = no
  | Participation = yes
  | Innovation = no
  }}

Effects
 Priority:      Very high (10 votes)
 Impact:        High      ( 9 votes)
 Feasability:   Medium    (10 votes)
 Desirability:  Very low  (10 votes)

Your vote        (This one is ambitious)
 Priority                                            (Drop down menu: Very high? High? Medium? Low? Very low?) (Nomber of votes)
 Impact
 Feasability
 Desirability

Content:               (one of these)
 {{fatured}}
 {{Draft}}
 {{UnderConstruction}}
 {{Historical}}
 {{Notice|sample text}}
 {{SectionNeedsWork}}
 {{Fact}} 

Members:                                          (it's not a part of proposal. so it should come here
  Arman
  Philippe
  wikiwookie

Progress:               (one of these)
 {{Merge|pagename}}
 {{Deprecated}}
 {{Doing}}
 {{Done}}
 {{ArchivedDone}}

Share: |f| |t| |su| ...                               (you can use {{Share}}

My motto: Show more, talk less

Nice!