User talk:Laura231

From Strategic Planning


RETIRED


This user is no longer active on this wiki.
This page uses the LiquidThreads discussion system. Try discussing in sandbox. Click "Start a new discussion" to begin a new discussion on this page.

Welcome, Laura231! :-) --Eekim 18:07, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good edits :-)

Good to see you here, Laura! Good edits. -- Philippe 05:29, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Iteration?

Hi Laura - I kind of liked "Call to Action"; I also think it's easier for translators than "iteration", as here. Is there a reason for a change? -- Philippe 05:33, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Philippe, Reason for my change was to make the language parallel to that in the material that will be shared with the board. This may not be necessary. Go ahead and revert me...I won't feel bad -- Laura231 05:48, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First convenors resolution

Laura, have a look at First convenors resolution, edit if necessary, and please sign if you do agree. Dedalus 09:28, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thnx

Laura, thanks for clarifying some links between categories of proposals and task forces. Dedalus 17:51, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And, thanks for raising this as an issue. As your message implied, there are clearly lots of inputs to what Serita named "emerging strategic priorities" - proposals are one, research that the bridgespan team has been doing is another (including interviews and data analysis). We need to continue to make this explicit. Laura231 17:54, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Original Barnstar
for not being afraid to do, to try, and to explore... -- Philippe 16:33, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]