where did "supporting reference content" mandate go?

  • Re. Divergence – I posted some thoughts at the Village Pump.
  • Re. LiquidThreads – It also does not support structured discussion very well. This has been raised at LiquidThreads Feedback a couple times (e.g. [1]) but I don't think the development team sees the value in it yet.
  • Re. Framing – The questions in the task force mandate are better framed than the ESP questions (some of which look like leading questions with ulterior purpose) but could probably be better still. I have some opinions on this that I will add to the ESP questions, but it may make an even greater muddle of what is already there.
Ningauble23:40, 30 October 2009

I followed up to your thread on Village Pump about Divergence. I'm very concerned about this, and I want to move to a solution quickly.

Regarding LiquidThreads: You can still edit Talk pages, and so structuring can happen that way. In other words, people can create subheaders and point to specific threads. I do get your overall point, though. The great potential for LiquidThreads (different from traditional forums) is the integration between wiki and forum capabilities. The ability to refactor a conversation is one of those.

Eekim00:49, 18 November 2009