Missing recommendations about how to increase participation in under-represented group.

I think we can be somewhat objective about it.

An article that is marked as a stub will be improved by nearly any edit. That's a 0/5 or 1/5, because most people will appreciate any effort to expand it.

An article that has been marked as a good or featured article will only be improved by editors with a great understanding. Those are 4/5's or 5/5's, because we expect the rate of reversion to be highest for these articles.

I guess that makes most normal articles a 2/5 or 3/5. More likely to be reverted than a stub, but not as likely as a featured article.

And most procedural stuff (creating an article, renaming an article, deleting an article) is at least a 3/5.

We can definitely start there.

Randomran19:46, 17 January 2010