Next steps: What we agree on

Next steps: What we agree on

Edited by another user.
Last edit: 06:24, 16 March 2010

So we got a LOT of great feedback here about the "What we agree on" threads. We should begin to review the comments here about the threads, and start to consolidate them onto wikipages. Maybe we can hash out some of the disagreements that way, too?

I'll make a run at it with the thread about the China task force, at Task_force/Strategy/What we agree on#China. I hope someone will pick up the others. :)

The goal here is to synthesize the feedback, not simply list it. It may be that we need to hash through some disagreements. That's okay. :)

-Philippe (who fails at logging in)

68.0.117.17206:15, 16 March 2010

I started several days ago with the CH on the corresponding thread, and managed even to generate some feedback, but I was travelling the whole week and could not continue. If everything goes fine I may continue tonight.

Yaroslav Blanter12:35, 16 March 2010
 

I copied the summaries of the recommendations over to that page, but I have not included any feedback. There is a big difference in how detailed the summaries are for the different Task Forces. At the moment I think it looks like a table of content for all the recommendations.

Dafer4511:57, 20 March 2010

Thanks, Dafer, that's a great place for us to start. Does anyone want to take on summarizing the feedback from a particular task force in an attempt to move us towards a overview of the response to these recommendations?

~Philippe (WMF)19:56, 29 March 2010
 

I put some of the analysis to Task force/Strategy/What we agree on (two points for community health); I will try to cover the community health and quality Taskforces in a couple of days. It would be good if someone would (i) start making similar analysis (I used the format earlier suggested by SJ) and (ii) cross-check that I did not write any bullshit.

Yaroslav Blanter20:43, 15 April 2010