What do we agree on: Advocacy TF recommendations

Edited by another user.
Last edit: 13:58, 13 March 2010

the next (theoretical) opportunity to make a substantial step forward for a partial solution is the meeting in berlin next month. maybe it would help to discuss and clarify the foundation-chapter-committee relations - related to the strategy process - there. which upcomming tasks are new for chapters and committees, which benchmarks are important in the different perspectives, who should host the - up-bottom or bottom-up - review process of ideas from the community, sharing responsibility or exclusive areas for specific core themes (beside trademarks, etc.), who and how to deal with non-offical forms of organization and so on.

de facto it`s the metalevel of Arnes proposal, differentiated and oriented on the - mid april available - strategy process results of advocacy tasks and how to achieve them.

that`s maybe a way to create a concret advocacy labor-agenda for regular controllable units without a damaged mirror of unbound stakeholder expectations and projections.

--Jan eissfeldt 13:58, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

84.185.87.16413:42, 13 March 2010