Barriers to Quality at Wikipedia (and potentially other Wiki projects)

    Will you do the "going back and getting clarification" bit?

    FT2 (Talk | email)04:37, 1 December 2009

    should it be me getting clarification?

    Admins, content, big picture -- I dont see them as three doors, I see door number one as the micro level including admins and content and I see door number two as the macro or big picture.

    I reread our mandate from the quality task force Wiki twice today. There was a large blanket statement about quality, not specific just to content. I still think we need to have a "talk" with those holding the strategy cards about what the concept of Wikipedia Quality covers to them, and then pitch a case for a wholesale look at the big picture if we feel it is necessary (obviously yes in my book.)

    And, I never assumed quality of content would be subsumed by anything. If the quality of content is not there, then my mandate to myself to help Wikipedia be cite-able by college students will never come to fruition. :)

    Bhneihouse07:40, 1 December 2009

    Yeah. "We know what we mean" :) Go for it.

    FT2 (Talk | email)19:01, 1 December 2009

    Anyone else want to weigh in on this before I bring it up to the powers that be who set the task forces up?

    Thanks for your vote of confidence, FT2. (I think that is what it was ;) )

    Bhneihouse21:27, 1 December 2009

    Please go ahead and ask them, more clarification is always welcome I guess :-)

    Woodwalker06:36, 2 December 2009