Talk:Sandbox

From Strategic Planning
Jump to: navigation, search


Information icon.svg
This page uses the LiquidThreads discussion system. Try discussing in sandbox. Click "Start a new discussion" to begin a new discussion on this page.


This page is for LiquidThreads testing only.

For usual wiki(-syntax) testing, use Sandbox.

 

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Creating more than 1 category tree (pluralism), then -> top list011:52, 9 February 2012
test114:27, 24 June 2011
Test political discussion415:50, 15 May 2011
test citations015:49, 15 May 2011
t2031020:32, 16 February 2011
Varför inte2302:00, 18 August 2010
Another test (changed subject)802:18, 3 July 2010
test023:09, 2 July 2010
Testing LiquidThreads815:11, 8 July 2010
test314:35, 4 May 2010
Testing108:56, 28 April 2010
26 February 2010 (UTC)e.jpg]]]010:59, 26 February 2010
testing again...004:30, 24 March 2010
File:Increase reach by 2015.png209:47, 6 February 2010
new test116:37, 30 January 2010
New test402:30, 7 February 2010
abc316:35, 30 January 2010
wiki world order005:05, 29 January 2010
testing118:05, 28 January 2010
sandbox testing006:42, 20 January 2010
First page
First page		 Previous page
Previous page		 Last page
Last page

Creating more than 1 category tree (pluralism), then -> top list

Hi! Tell me please, is there a technical possibility of creating more than 1 category tree (with the subsequent selection of the best, like a evolution process). If not, will it be done? Discussed a proposal like this, and where? Fractaler 11:52, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Fractaler‎11:52, 9 February 2012

test

test

213.134.175.225‎21:17, 23 June 2011

I think I see triple, need to clean my glasses :P

TBloemink‎14:27, 24 June 2011
 

Test political discussion

Here's a list of topics"

1 Executive branch 2 Judicial Branch 3 Olive Branch

87.121.1.71‎17:06, 16 November 2010

Wrong tree

87.121.1.71‎17:06, 16 November 2010

test

Addihockey10‎17:26, 5 February 2011

Hi ああああ

203.141.92.14‎08:10, 17 February 2011
 
 

olive branchSorry husband father 15:50, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Sorry husband father‎15:50, 15 May 2011
 

test citations

testSorry husband father 15:49, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Sorry husband father‎15:49, 15 May 2011

t2031

Thread summary:[Link to] [Edit]

summary of t2031

t2031body

Cretep‎20:31, 16 February 2011

Varför inte

Detta kanske kunde vara något för svenska Wikipedia?

LA2‎21:56, 16 December 2009

Ja, varför inte?

213.89.144.203‎22:03, 16 December 2009

Verkar ju riktigt bra detta!

  • Edit* Verkar ju riktigt smidigt att man kan följa en specifik diskussion och inte hela sidan.
Sertion‎22:19, 16 December 2009
Emblem-question.svg

Hur blir det med signaturer då? Är det fortfarande formaterade?

Hur fungerar bilder?

Sertion‎21:28, 18 December 2009

Ha

94.251.135.253‎06:29, 3 July 2010

Testing out Liquidthreads here, posting in random places, causing trouble.

Jtmorgan‎18:42, 3 July 2010
Show 1 reply
 
 
 

Är det verigen bakåtkompatibelt? Vad händer om man ligger in detta på en befinlig diskussionssida?

79.136.45.134‎22:07, 17 December 2009
 

Testar en grej.

80.88.102.158‎01:10, 18 December 2009

Mer test

80.88.102.158‎01:10, 18 December 2009

Hmm.

80.88.102.158‎01:11, 18 December 2009
 
 
 

verkar bra alltså.

Tetraedycal‎22:12, 16 December 2009

Håller med.

Calandrella‎22:58, 16 December 2009
 

Javisst.

EAman‎23:20, 19 December 2009
 

Lite segt med rutan som kommer upp på min dator - det tar lång tid, alltså, nog längre tid än när en klicka "redigera" i vanliga fall - men antagligen betydligt mer intuitivt för nya användare. Och tildena är riktigt bra att bli av med... IMO får vi som är vana vid det gamla diskussionssättet anpassa oss till den nya designen; då de flesta av oss är mer datorvana än genomsnittet av en ny användare, går det nog mycket bättre än att nybörjarna ska behöva anpassa sig till Wikimediaprojektens egentligen väldigt föråldrade diskussionssätt. Sammanfattat: jag är inte odelat positiv, men visst, hellre detta än det gamla.

Calandrella‎22:57, 16 December 2009
 

Långa diskar bruckar offta bli svåra atttt följa. Det blir kanske lättare såhär. Men jag vet inte... -- Lavallen 16:43, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Lavallen‎16:43, 17 December 2009
 
Edited by another user.
Last edit: 13:15, 30 December 2009

Jag tycker att det ser bättre ut i läsläge, men svårare att följa via historiken och därmed, antar jag, via SÄ och bevakningslista.

Hihi jag redigerar Dcastors inlägg! Plrk 13:15, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Dcastor‎14:16, 18 December 2009

Möjlighet att bevaka enskilda diskussionstrådar är guld värt. Jag tror att det kommer leda till ett uppsving på aktiviteten på en del diskussionssidor i Wikipedia-namnrymden, framförallt Bybrunnen.

Plrk‎13:14, 30 December 2009
Edited by another user.
Last edit: 21:08, 3 June 2010

Så här svarar man alltså ett inlägg?!

.

Lavallen‎11:32, 16 April 2010
 
 

Eller for den norske?

Hilsen Kjetil_r‎21:01, 3 June 2010

Med norsk, mener du bokmål/riksmål eller nynorsk?

Kjetil_r‎21:03, 3 June 2010
Sorry... :-)

sorry, mente bokmål/riksmål.

Kjetil_r‎21:04, 3 June 2010
 

Kjempeidé!

Kjetil_r‎21:05, 3 June 2010
 
 
 

Another test (changed subject)

Thread summary:[Link to] [Edit]

This is a summarize created by clicking on summarize.

testing. so i don't need to provide a signature anymore?

Tempodivalse [talk]‎15:50, 24 October 2009

Test response

Eloquence‎00:49, 29 October 2009
 

Will it end the possibility to have your own, personalized signature?

80.88.102.158‎01:05, 18 December 2009

Nope, your sig is still settable in preferences.

~Philippe (WMF)‎02:10, 18 December 2009
 

one more reply

86.32.239.87‎14:21, 20 December 2009
 

good thing

87.178.122.32‎11:53, 27 December 2009
 

another reply, testing...

131.179.176.207‎21:56, 1 February 2010
 

Ah, you can still see the conversation while typing the reply! Nice.

163.1.174.65‎16:41, 1 February 2010

Yeah, that's the thing I like about LiquidThreads. :-)

Diego Grez‎02:18, 3 July 2010
 
 

test

ne prenez pas garde à moi

76.235.109.124‎23:09, 2 July 2010

Testing LiquidThreads

This post is maybe way of for this page. Sorry for posting it here. I've just want to test out the LiquidThreads functionality after a proposal to add this extension to the no-wikipedia at [1].

Nsaa‎22:20, 3 June 2010

I moved it to here :)

~Philippe (WMF)‎22:29, 3 June 2010
 

Lite tillegg for testing. Legg merke til at innlegget ikke avsluttes med fire tilder, dette legges til av utvidelsen.

Jeblad‎23:16, 3 June 2010

Så svarer jeg på mitt innlegg, forrige innlegg var et svar på nsaa sitt innlegg.

Jeblad-demo‎23:21, 3 June 2010

Hvordan vil dette virke om en har f. eks. Tinget på overvåking? Må en sette hver tråd på overvåkingslisten, for da vil det bli for komplisert i praksis.

Nina Aldin Thune‎23:33, 3 June 2010
Edited by 2 users.
Last edit: 07:25, 4 June 2010

Bwø, dette er en testetest. Jeg er l33t, så jeg skriver fire tilder sjøl om jeg ikke trenger. Jon Harald Søby 23:53, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Det er også mulig å redigere innlegg, både egne og andres. Melding om nye beskjeder får man på Special:NewMessages. Jon Harald Søby 23:54, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Jon Harald Søby‎23:53, 3 June 2010

det er litt vanskelig å finne gamle meldinger igjen om en trykkker på lest.

Nina Aldin Thune‎23:57, 3 June 2010
 
 
 
 
Blomst
Kjetil_r‎07:27, 4 June 2010

  • Bil

  • Bil 2.0

Kjetil_r‎07:29, 4 June 2010
 
 

test

testing new liquid thread feature. cool! Tempodivalse [talk] 23:50, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Tempodivalse [talk]‎23:50, 14 October 2009

Yeah, very nice. 202.124.190.173 04:25, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

202.124.190.173‎04:25, 16 October 2009
Edited by another user.
Last edit: 07:17, 21 October 2009

The subpage thingy has got me confused :P =P

202.124.190.173‎04:28, 16 October 2009
 
 
 

Testing

testing 123

~Philippe (WMF)‎21:55, 9 February 2010
 

26 February 2010 (UTC)e.jpg]]]

link title[[Link title][[File:Exampl--83.86.105.79 10:59, 26 February 2010 (UTC)e.jpg]]]

83.86.105.79‎10:59, 26 February 2010

testing again...

Thread summary:[Link to] [Edit]

well

Should I add one of this to each page? Is it any possible summary of last activity in the main page?

131.179.176.207‎21:59, 1 February 2010

new test

nice! =)

143.107.45.213‎16:51, 3 November 2009
Edited by another user.
Last edit: 16:37, 30 January 2010

Just testing to answer...

(edit: edited by Lar)
Calandrella‎22:59, 16 December 2009
 

New test

Starting a new discussion....

202.124.190.173‎04:27, 16 October 2009

Starting a new reply...

81.237.96.5‎14:15, 17 December 2009

I want to reply here

++Lar: t/c‎16:36, 30 January 2010
 

new reply without attaching signature

86.32.239.87‎14:18, 20 December 2009
 

Well, this seems to be working. But the visual appearance is a bit confusing/unclear

Saibo‎02:30, 7 February 2010
 

abc

sdfadfsdf --Kozuch 08:34, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Kozuch‎08:34, 15 December 2009

abc

Kozuch‎09:04, 15 December 2009
 

As you can see, you no longer need to sign your comment.

LA2‎22:06, 16 December 2009
 

what if you want to sign it? you get two?

++Lar: t/c‎16:35, 30 January 2010
 

wiki world order

as you know, einstein postulated that one world government could eliminate war. not that I am advocating that. but wiki has the ability to put forth political agenda in a truly democratic way.

health care, for instance. I think there should be some govt sponsored or provided health insurance. Is Obama going to get it done for us? Who knows.

We can join forces with each other to really get the important things accomplished, without the problems of appealing to every special interest group.

let me know what you think of this!

Thanks, WW

Wikiworld‎05:05, 29 January 2010

testing

Thread summary:[Link to] [Edit]

Summarizing... and summary updated.

testing

203.82.92.117‎07:16, 21 October 2009

More testing (that also needs to be summarized.)

62.17.140.34‎14:32, 27 January 2010
 

sandbox testing

testing testing it works :)

71.202.16.29‎06:42, 20 January 2010
First page
First page		 Previous page
Previous page		 Last page
Last page
Retrieved from "http://strategy.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sandbox&oldid=64500#sandbox_testing_3025"