Second question: what is Community Health anyway?

I think the problem with trying to group areas together is that it is moving us towards the general and away from the focused and explicit.

It's moving in the wrong direction. We should be aiming towards providing recommendations that are actionable. Not presenting vague intentions.

We started off facing broad problems. Our remit is to suggest concrete ways in which those problems can be attacked.

I don't mind the idea of us having "16 or 25 recommendations" so long as we present, at most, four. Remember, we're not the only task force. If each task force came up with even four that would be overwhelming for the small staff of the WMF. And Philippe has explicitly asked us for no more than four. That's what our job is.

Even on a practical basis, I see far too little activity on the wiki for us to produce even five solid recommendations, so sixteen is beyond my imagining.