What do we agree on?

I feel unsure about what we are supposed to do as well. I also feel that I am very unable to judge the relative importance of the different strategies. All I can do is to analyse the strategies and find agreements/disagreements.

Probably everone else feels the same, because there hasn't been any real new progress on this discussion page yet, only summaries of what has been done before and not any synthesis. So what probably is needed now is clearer guidlines about what we are supposed to do.

Dafer4514:14, 13 February 2010

Yes. The other thing that concerns me is that it appears that TF members may not know of the discussions here. I wonder if many of them have assumed that their work is done. If that's the case I would feel bad removing any TF-created content without the people that drafted that content here to argue for its retainment or at least to guide the decision-making.

Bodnotbod14:52, 13 February 2010

I agree.

Dafer4514:59, 13 February 2010
 

I think we are expected to provide concise recommendations which serve as a kind of summary to the long elaborated recommendations of the Task forces. We can also indicate what we expect from WMF concerning various recommendation groups.

Yaroslav Blanter17:54, 13 February 2010