controversial articles and neutrality problems

Okay

You're naive.

:)

The link is to a dispute I resolved exactly that way. It's not the only one I've done that on. What's interesting is the article's been stable ever since, and that was 2 years ago.

Our job is to characterize the views, including the (genuine) dispute if any. Not to take sides on it, nor to try and decide the answer for the academic population. That makes it a lot easier. People just don't think that saying "we don't know which" or "it's in dispute" is a valid option. But it is.