The Foundation should ask for both the .wiki. and .wk. top level domains.
Given the site's success, it would lead to saving a lot of typing and expand the ability to cite articles in short messages, especially if the url substring "wiki/" can be avoided or shortened after the shorter domains. For example, URLs such as http://en.wk/Article , http://en.wiki/Article or perhaps http://en.wk/w/Article , etc., would save large aggregate amounts of typing time and short message space.
Is it reasonable to expect that the .wk. domain could be otherwise more efficiently assigned? Are there any countries with initial w and k sounds likely to petition the ISO for recognition?
- I'd be interested to hear the thoughts on this matter of wiki inventor w:Ward Cunningham, who has been closely involved with ICANN in the past (and for all I know, still is). Ward is a very clear thinker about the directions wiki is evolving, and his reflections would be helpful in evaluating a proposal like this. -Peteforsyth 03:18, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Possibly much lower than expected based on previous domain quotations. Possibly almost zero!
There is only one way to find out: ask.
@RodBeckstrom on Twitter, personal communication
Do you have a thought about this proposal? A suggestion? Discuss this proposal by going to Proposal talk:.WIKI. and .WK. top level domains.
Want to work on this proposal?
- Vibhijain 10:02, 6 May 2011 (UTC) Would save time
- .. Sign your name here!