Proposal:Remove duplicated contents

    From Strategic Planning
    Status (see valid statuses)

    The status of this proposal is:
    Request for Discussion / Sign-Ups

    Every proposal should be tied to one of the strategic priorities below.

    Edit this page to help identify the priorities related to this proposal!

    1. Achieve continued growth in readership
    2. Focus on quality content
    3. Increase Participation
    4. Stabilize and improve the infrastructure
    5. Encourage Innovation


    Content duplicated between pages i)wastes server space, ii)confuses readers and, most importantly, iii) creates an opportunity for content forking.

    For example, History of the United States may not always be in agreement with the History chapter of United States. What will a reader understand?


    First, No Duplication should be written as an editorial policy.

    Second, the use of transcluded lead paragraphs should be encouraged when creating summary article. Please refer to the Pathology article as example. You must look at an older version of the page because the tranclusion has since been undone.

    This example of complex transclusion was discussed here


    I am tired of maintaining the same content in different articles. Why couldn't all the editors meet in the same article? Isn't that the idea behind NPOV?

    Key Questions

    Why is WP:NO DUPLICATION a red link?

    Potential Costs



    None; internal Wikipedia issue

    Community Discussion

    Do you have a thought about this proposal? A suggestion? Discuss this proposal by going to Proposal talk:Remove duplicated contents.

    Want to work on this proposal?

    1. .. Sign your name here!