Proposal:Support for high resolution images

From Strategic Planning
Status (see valid statuses)

The status of this proposal is:
Request for Discussion / Sign-Ups

Every proposal should be tied to one of the strategic priorities below.

Edit this page to help identify the priorities related to this proposal!

  1. Achieve continued growth in readership
  2. Focus on quality content
  3. Increase Participation
  4. Stabilize and improve the infrastructure
  5. Encourage Innovation


The wikimedia-software should support the usage of ultra high resolution images (>10 Megapixel) better. Most of the time, people don't want to download the entire picture to see a larger version of the image preview. Currently, Wikimedia exposes only two options on a picture's homepage: (1) a preview of width 800, and (2) the option to download the whole image. Often times, the whole image is 5 MegaBytes+, whereas a user only wants to see a larger image of width around 1500 pixels and not 6000.



On Commons we have many high quality panorama images with 50 Megapixel and more. Also scans of old images and maps have such a high resolution.

It is difficult to watch such images. Also with highspeed internet access it needs long to load the 10 or more Megabyte of such an image. With a low speed connection it is not posssible to view.

The solution is to split such images in small tiles for different zoom levels. It's the same like google maps or Openstreetmap works. So we can use the same techology we develop for Openstreetmap integration:

So the viewer could work with Openlayers and we only need a little script to produce the tiles.

I program a little (unoptimize) viewer example:

More options

Add a few more resolutions to download: 1500 and 3000. This will both save users time in seeing a closeup of an image as well as save on Wikimedia server bandwidth.


For me are this highres images a own mediatype between normal images and video. I can look 15 minutes in such a images and find each time new interesting details. It's like an interactive video because I decide how long I look on each detail.

I'm also active at where the NASA develop a low cost way to produce such highres images:

Key Questions

Potential Costs

  • The costs would be very small. A few lines of PHP. We could also save traffic because nobody need to download the whole image.


Community Discussion

Do you have a thought about this proposal? A suggestion? Discuss this proposal by going to Proposal talk:Support for high resolution images.

Want to work on this proposal?

  1. .. Sign your name here!