An interesting proposal but...
Realistically speaking, it will never happen. As long as people are able to submit information without citations and there isn't a resource of qualified/reputable academics that can check the quality, verifiability, and accuracy of every reference used throughout Wikipedia, it will never be considered a reliable resource inside of schools (especially in higher education). -Hooliganb 03:35, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- This looks to be the wrong way round. Claiming reliability should follow the establishing of said reliability. There is a version of Wikipedia for schools, with this a complete piece of fantasy (and maybe this is worse), which suggests that this supposed reliability is a long way off, and perhaps unattainable. - Brya 06:20, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Some proposals will have massive impact on end-users, including non-editors. Some will have minimal impact. What will be the impact of this proposal on our end-users? -- Philippe 00:09, 3 September 2009 (UTC)