Proposal talk:Interwikis and categories outside article code

From Strategic Planning
Jump to navigation Jump to search

If we put these outside article text, adding new stuff later may become more difficult. --Liangent 14:24, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't understand : what kind of "new stuff" ? Darkoneko 22:57, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If we want to add some new features, putting every of these into their own fields seems more difficult than putting them in article code. --Liangent 06:57, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


As I pointed out at the other proposal, it looks to me that it becomes time to have negative interwiki's. Articles at different language projects often do not cover the same topics in one article, which means that there is an assymmetry. Introducing a negative interwiki ("this article does not equate to ....") could prevent the tangled clutter of interwiki's that we now sometimes suffer. - Brya 14:00, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Some proposals will have massive impact on end-users, including non-editors. Some will have minimal impact. What will be the impact of this proposal on our end-users? -- Philippe 00:11, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

None. The display (viewer side) doesn't have to be affected. Darkoneko 15:09, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]