Proposal talk:Most wanted articles or WIKI-links

From Strategic Planning
Jump to navigation Jump to search

We have http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Most_wanted_articles in en. I am not sure whether that would be better or worse than collecting statistics from failed searches, which is sure to find a lot of spelling errors. I remember at one time there was an effort to provide redirects for common spelling mistakes, though, so I'm not sure. Redirects can be more valuable than a short stub. 99.25.114.234 20:08, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Most visited articles

There is a statistics website with lists of most visited pages in all WMF projects, e. g. most visited pages in August on en:wp. Holder 05:04, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

  • This is insufficient; it does not distinguish between existent and non-existent articles. It also does not list enough articles, only the top 100 or 1000. Joey the Mango 07:00, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Impact?

Some proposals will have massive impact on end-users, including non-editors. Some will have minimal impact. What will be the impact of this proposal on our end-users? -- Philippe 00:13, 3 September 2009 (UTC)