Proposal talk:Recognize that Wikipedia is more than an encyclopedia and fork it

From Strategic Planning


One or 2 databases

I think this idea is interesting, and the best way would be to have 1 database, to avoid duplication and incompleteness. I mean it'd be stupid that the user have to look in the 2 projects to check if the lacking information is not there. 13:15, 23 September 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Three databases ?

  1. The inclusionnist encyclopedia would contain all the articles that anybody would like to write
  2. The challenging encyclopedia would contain a set of reviewed articles from no 1.
  3. The deletionnist encyclopedia would only contain a selection of articles from no 1 or no 1.

Cantons-de-l'Est 12:50, 8 November 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]


How would this differ from Wikia? --LauraHale 16:09, 20 November 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]