Proposal talk:Relevanz selbst bestimmen (Allow authors to determine relevance)

From Strategic Planning
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Wikipedia is not censored for morality. We document the best and worst, under the theory of muckraking. 99.60.0.22 05:14, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the proposal, the german wiki is ruled by a bunch of guys preventing the wiki to expand. e.g. The english wikipedia has lots of information about tv series (episodes, chars, etc.), but in the german version there are some people deleting all new articles in that way. Next example two years ago i tried to make an article about Aion - Tower of Eternity and it was deleted with the comment: We are no Media/Games-Database. Strange but now there is an article about this game. Next example: One Year ago me and some co-students tried to make an article about a new design of lessons on german secondary schools in collaboration with a doctor of education who is specialist at this topic. After getting deleted 2 times by a guy, who was an rollercoaster specialist according to his page, we gave up. Conclusion: Take the power from those „I made 1000 posts so my opinion is more worth than yours“-guys. 88.217.12.84 00:11, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I gather that the German Wiki has stricter inclusion criteria than EN Wiki. But this proposal is to go much broader than even EN wiki, do the authors of this really want to allow any company to spam wikipedia at will? WereSpielChequers 15:24, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Impact?

Some proposals will have massive impact on end-users, including non-editors. Some will have minimal impact. What will be the impact of this proposal on our end-users? -- Philippe 00:15, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]