Some proposals will have massive impact on end-users, including non-editors. Some will have minimal impact. What will be the impact of this proposal on our end-users? -- Philippe 00:45, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
This isn't so much a fundraising idea as a plea for rampant inclusionism. So I suggest this proposal be renamed abolish verifiability, notability and any attempt at quality control by deleting anything. WereSpielChequers 20:32, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Can we please rename this page to something like Proposal: A Wikipedia Fundraising Strategy - Small Donations There will be other Strategy proposals for Fundraising. (See Strategy for Funding)
nail on the head
i have been mistreated by wikipedians and content removed and because of that there is no way in HELL i would give to wikipedia unless i saw some serious reform of the way things work ,and i am one of the few people i know that does give to causes.
i am also a little suspicious of where the money would go, as i've observed non-profits go crazy with spending as money comes in in the past. also, why did wikipedia (according to urban lore) turned down an offer from google for free hosting.
18.104.22.168 01:19, 4 October 2009 (UTC)