Talk:Emerging strategic priorities/ESP 4 key questions/What key groups are under-represented, and why?

From Strategic Planning
  • Women are under-represented, and so are older folks. (We know this in part from the user survey.) -- ArielGlenn 02:52, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • exemple of communication mostly graphical
    All non English speaking people; cause the reflection is made in English (and translate after if possible). This wikimédia page is a great example. Can we do something? I think yes, I believe we can graphically represent the problems, and graphically find solutions, it's an universal language. It's also a very scientific language, theorized in communications sciences, and understandable by every body with non difficulty, with no risk of bad translation. It's not for today, may be an utopia, but it's a way of reflexion, and sometime also a way to help the reflexion. Smily 09:52, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • For-profit organizations seem under-represented. Probably because there is no much profit for them. --Fiable.biz 08:42, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Non-profit organizations seem under-represented. Probably because there is no much profit for them, and they have their own purpose and project. --Fiable.biz 08:42, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • This may be the wrong question. What is meant here? A proportional representation of the world population? Or the key groups that hold access to the areas of knowledge that normally would make up an encyclopedia? These are very different approaches. If the latter applies then there is the issue that for some areas of knowledge there exist disproportionally few practioners, and in as far as they get involved in Wikipedia they will consistently and automatically be outvoted. - Brya 14:15, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]