From Strategic Planning
Jump to: navigation, search


Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Rename Wikimedia-pedia408:10, 26 February 2011
need for centralised (wikis-wide) error reporting and other unifying links001:35, 14 January 2011

Rename Wikimedia-pedia

User:Kozuch 09:00, 3 December 2009 (UTC):

I find the word "Wikimedia-pedia" just not nice. Yet I do recognize what wants to be meant with it and that such a bunch of information is important. But, in the long term, such info should be centralized on the Foundations website, as soon as it gets open to public editing (which it really should). Actually, we could join all the non-content backstage projects into the foundation website - simply one place to rule the background of all Wikimedia.

Quoted by

05:01, 30 October 2010

Just what I wanted to say.

05:03, 30 October 2010

That's why we have meta ;)

19:14, 2 November 2010

Having just read the "be bold" campaign page, I felt quite emboldened and renamed the subject line from "remane" to "rename" : D

01:37, 14 January 2011
08:10, 26 February 2011

need for centralised (wikis-wide) error reporting and other unifying links

. . .

Greetings all,

You can see specifics of my error problem here:

How does a single error report relate to strategic growth questions, including improving editor trends? I have just come from Wikimedia-Pedia and note not a single reference to errors across the entire subject range.

Might we be looking too hard at the complications and not enough at potential simplifications? Certainly, this new input box with an "advanced" tab seems to be working fine, unlike earlier "talk" versions raised in the error report linked above.

apologies for breaking in at the top level, but have not been able to find anything online. See google search:


many thanks,


. . .

Avaiki simple error stopping editors?

01:35, 14 January 2011