Finding and interviewing ex-editors

Hey Howie,

I tweaked some wording for clarity. I also added an answer about feedback and appreciation (focusing specifically on the "reward" hypothesis) as a criticism of the community.

I also took a crack at question four, so it wasn't such a no-brainer. Everyone will say that Wikipedia has a lot of missing and incorrect content. Maybe if we focus on "important" content we'll get a more interesting answer. (I'm still not fully happy with this question. I'd really like to find out if we lost an editor who could have been really helpful, or an editor that had more or less hit their peak. Not sure how to phrase it.)

Everything else looks pretty much solid though.

Getting the "check the top three answers" is key, though. Very important. If we have to slip "select three" into the actual question phrasing, then do it, even if it looks sloppy.