Ensuring high quality sources where needed, especially science/academic topics (narrow focus)

There are two aspects:

  • Some editors are comfortable with "no result/no compromise" thinking that over time they will have the consensus to impose their "view". What's funny is that often both side of the discussion think this way.
  • Some editors are really PoV pushers who feaster on aggravating edit conflict and strife. They know that their view won't pass and a comprise will be found but until then they will drag their feet and use the edit conflict to make their view soundly know.
KrebMarkt19:05, 25 December 2009