English wiki Unsourced BLP Drama Pragmatic Review

Yeah, this leads us back to the fundamental debate. Are the articles being worked on or not? Has there been ample time to improve them already or not? Are the articles in bad enough shape to delete them or not?

Any answer that's going to have buy-in from both sides will probably need to be in the middle. Some articles have had enough time to improve, and aren't being worked on, and are in bad shape worthy of deletion. Other articles need more time and will get some attention, or are in decent shape and don't need to be deleted. The compromise will recognize that different articles will require different approaches.

I like your answer. But this strategy session can't enforce that answer. What we can do is find a process that will arrive at an answer. Why aren't people rallying behind some kind of compromise? What's missing from the current process? Where did ArbCom go wrong?