User talk:Teles

From Strategic Planning
Jump to: navigation, search

Barnstar

Original Barnstar.png The Original Barnstar
for doing a fantastic job admin'ing. ~Philippe (WMF) 00:44, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar

Original Barnstar.png The Original Barnstar
for working to develop a "friendlier" initial warning template. ~Philippe (WMF) 03:39, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Admin701:24, 7 June 2011
Welcome120:35, 7 May 2011
fyi206:54, 25 April 2011
Talkpages without associated subject pages522:37, 6 April 2011
Welcome!005:04, 14 March 2011

Hi Teles, I granted you sysop rights on strategy wiki, as per your request Process/Administrators/volunteers. Thanks for offering to help out, feel free to direct any queries to me.

Theo1001115:15, 15 March 2011

Thank you. Please, tell me if someday I do anything wrong. Have a nice day.

TeleS (T M @ C G)22:20, 15 March 2011

Hey hey, look who's there! xD Darwinius 02:55, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Darwinius02:55, 28 May 2011

Fala, Darwin! Pois é... tô por aqui, dando uma força no combate ao vandalismo. De vez em quando aqui fica meio agitado. E você? O que traz de novidade?

TeleS (T M @ C S)03:37, 28 May 2011

Hahaha. Se fosse você não perguntava xD Ruy Pugliesi 18:59, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Ruy Pugliesi18:59, 29 May 2011

Ih... perguntei. Agora já era.

TeleS (T M @ C S)21:28, 29 May 2011
 
 
 
 
 

Ad: Hi there, thank you. :)

Mikołkatalk (plwiki)e-mail20:29, 7 May 2011
 : )
TeleS (T M @ C G)20:35, 7 May 2011
 

The IP in question on Editor survey feedback is w:User:Sven70, who has been indeffed there for becoming increasingly incivil. He apparently writes in the shorthand he uses due to RSI.

sonia00:36, 25 April 2011

Hi, Sonia! Thanks for your information. I didn't know about the RSI issue, but I could partially comprehend what was written. I was more concerned about the offensive part of his comments, which is not related with the way he writes and is unnacceptable on a respectful discussion. Anyway, I won't call it "gibberish" anymore. Have a nice day.

TeleS (T M @ C G)02:04, 25 April 2011

Yep, hence it was just an FYI and not a "Why are you being bigoted against the disabled!!!1111" ;)

And I do agree. That is exactly why he was blocked, because he was not able to rationally converse with other editors and thus exhausted the last of their patience. For what it's worth, I have RSI (although it is not debilitating), and see no reason for such shorthand to be necessary or more effective than your standard "txt talk" or whatever shorthand it is the young'uns use these days.

sonia06:54, 25 April 2011
 
 

Talkpages without associated subject pages

I just went through Special:AllPages/Talk: and there's an unusually large number of pages in the talk namespace without their associated subject-namespace pages. Is there maybe a way to speed up the process of going through and deleting them without cluttering up the rest of RecentChanges?

TeleComNasSprVen04:30, 5 April 2011

Hi. Since it is a non-controversial act, I guess I could delete them using a bot flag to avoid flooding the recent changes. However, I am new as a sysop here and have never used the bot flag. So, I would feel more comfortable if you ask this same question to a more experienced sysop. If s/he agreeds I would surely delete these pages. Regards.” TeleS (T M @ C G) 00:47, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

TeleS (T M @ C G)00:47, 6 April 2011

I'm going to drop the bot flag on you. :)

~Philippe (WMF)03:48, 6 April 2011

Teles, you now have the bot flag. When you're done, go to Special:UserRights, and unbot yourself, please.

~Philippe (WMF)03:50, 6 April 2011

Thank you, Philippe :)

I only deleted pages that apparently had no use. A few talk pages didn't have an associated page but were transcluded on other discussions or were used as archives, so were not deleted. Here is the log. Regards.

TeleS (T M @ C G)05:49, 6 April 2011

Thank you so much to both of you! I think I'll stay here for some time and help cleanup whatever needs doing. :)

TeleComNasSprVen22:37, 6 April 2011