I think instead of looking ahead 5 years we should look ahead 6 months because wikipeida could change beyond notice in that ammount of time

I think instead of looking ahead 5 years we should look ahead 6 months because wikipeida could change beyond notice in that ammount of time, for instance I would doubt that it would have been concived that Jack Tweed has a article 6 months ago.

Sure. There's no question that we have to look both at the near future and the distant future. There's a pretty fantastic process overview that goes into some of these questions at this page.

I could not concieve changes to wikipeida more then 6 months into the future.

This is tactical thinking. Wikimedia will be what we make it to be in 5 years or 6 months. Strategy is all about defining a desirable future state and then making it happen. Don't let someone else decide what Wikimedia is in 6 months or 5 years because you won't like it. That's our job!

+1

We can all decide together what wikipeida will be like more then 6 months in the future, but hopefully and most likley it will have a simalar function also purpose. But wikimedia can work towards achieve this for wikipeida.