Jump to content

Proposal:Academic web2

From Strategic Planning
Status (see valid statuses)

The status of this proposal is:
Request for Discussion / Sign-Ups

Every proposal should be tied to one of the strategic priorities below.

Edit this page to help identify the priorities related to this proposal!

  1. Achieve continued growth in readership
  2. Focus on quality content
  3. Increase Participation
  4. Stabilize and improve the infrastructure
  5. Encourage Innovation


Wikipedia could make better connections to academia who could integrate researches and summaries into it. Articles could be reviewed. This could be possible only if Wikipedia can be used as a working platform based on web2.


Currently it is not preferred to cite Wiki as the resource as anyone can change the text and there is no content editor. Wiki can be made better if editing is replaced with list of reviewers that would be credited for such work.


Academic motivations but if you employ me I would be happy.

Key Questions

Scientific reliability and accuracy of information.

Potential Costs

Programming costs + preparation for academic standards + curating/networking In addition grants to best student articles.


Community Discussion

Do you have a thought about this proposal? A suggestion? Discuss this proposal by going to Proposal talk:Academic web2.

Want to work on this proposal?

  1. .. Sign your name here!