Proposal:Markup for Maps
If not English, in what language is this proposal submitted?:
Instead of a tedious creation of maps, star maps, geographical maps, other maps, create a markup system that generates maps as needed.
The proposal regards constructing a markup language that generates maps instead of the editors providing images. This should be seen as a complement to providing images, not a sole restricted alternative.
In order to generate a map over Putnok, the editor could write:
<map> TYPE: Earth CAPTION: Position of Putnok, [[Hungary]] SIZE: 200x200(px) PROJECTION: Mercator CENTER: Hungary SPOT(reddot.jpg): 48°18'N, 20°26'E DETAIL LEVEL: 12 ; for roads and towns shown GEOGRAPHY LEVEL: 4 ; for rivers and topography shown </map>
autogenerating a relevant map over that town. In order to generate a sky map highlighting Sirrah (a.k.a. Alpheratz, Alpha Andromedae):
<map> TYPE: Sky CAPTION: The star Alpha in constellation [[Andromeda]] SIZE: 300x224(px) PROJECTION: Lambert conformal conic projection CENTER: Andromeda SQUARE(border=2px,color=red,dimensions=2°x2°): RA00h08m23s, DE+29°05′26″ STAR LEVEL: 6.5 ; for stars NEBULAE LEVEL: 6.0 ; for nebulous objects, nebulae and stars </map>
Easier map creation for the editor. Possibly also some storage benefits for the Wikipedia servers, while the cost might be some CPU time.
Is it needed? Or are there freely available software out there that can already do the same thing? For star maps PP3 have existed for a long time, with the troubles that an installation is so complex and has so many dependencies that it requires an advanced programmer and essentially a Linux-like environment. Making it a markup language would make it available to any editor (equality aspect). For geographical maps I don't know. One markup for many map types might be important for the common user.
- What benefits would this have over the standards based GML ?
- Programming time,
- Server CPU.
- the proposal's techie notes, programming, math and similar,
- Proposal:Markup for charts and graphs, similar to, but doesn't regard centrally stored data such as map data,
- Proposal:Visualization methods, is vaguer and more extensive, but reasons in the same direction,
- Proposal:Infographics, that one too.
Do you have a thought about this proposal? A suggestion? Discuss this proposal by going to Proposal talk:Markup for Maps.
Want to work on this proposal?
- .. Sign your name here!