Proposal:Real-time chat

From Strategic Planning
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Status (see valid statuses)

The status of this proposal is:
Request for Discussion / Sign-Ups

Every proposal should be tied to one of the strategic priorities below.

Edit this page to help identify the priorities related to this proposal!


  1. Achieve continued growth in readership
  2. Focus on quality content
  3. Increase Participation
  4. Stabilize and improve the infrastructure
  5. Encourage Innovation



Emblem-star.svg This is a featured proposal.
This template automatically categorizes into Category:Featured proposals. All proposals marked by this template should be on this list too.
Bug blank.svg A feature request or bug related to this proposal has been submitted to Bugzilla under ID 11190.

See Category:Proposals with Bugzilla submissions for all submitted bugs.

Summary

Wikipedians have long felt the need for higher-bandwidth channels of communication: IRC channels, small-group and one-to-one instant messaging, Skype, blogs, etc. However, it is tough to learn about these elements of the community and non-trivial to figure out how to use some of the technology. To the extent that it can be done by appropriating other free software, Wikimedia projects should integrate these features directly into their MediaWiki sites.

Proposal

Add the following features (pending the availability of compatible free software):

  • In-browser Wikimedia-hosted IRC-type chat rooms. On Wikipedias and Wikinewses there should be a channel for each article, accessible at a click, so that any users working on an article at the same time could chat.
  • Blogging--like with blog.wikimedia.org--available to all users (with the expectation that blogs will be generally focused on the Wikimedia projects and related topics)
  • Microblogging
  • Contact lists to keep track of when collaborators are online together (revealing online status would be optional, obviously)
  • Instant messaging between users
  • Voice chat

Motivation

Wikimedians are already using all these types of communication (except article-specific chat rooms) to extend the social sphere of the Wikimedian community beyond the confines of the sites themselves. Participation in these more social aspects of the community likely contributes to many members sticking around and contributing as much as they do, and when they are at their best these channels make it more fun and more emotionally healthful to be part of the community. However, the need to go off-site to access richer communication tools (for both collaboration and casual conversation) excludes many users. Providing as many of these communication tools as possible directly within Wikimedia sites would strengthen the community and make collaboration easier.

Key Questions

  • How many more users would contribute if the projects were more personal and interactive social environments?
  • How much do the current social environments on projects (or lack thereof) act to primarily attract users of certain psychological dispositions and repel others? (Is there any validity, for example, to the study that found Wikipedians to be more disagreeable and anti-social than the general population? If so, is that caused in part by the social limitations of the software environments of our projects?)
  • How would the learning curve for new editors change if they could type their questions into a real-time chat window on any page and be answered by experienced editors?
  • What impact would features that encourage private collaboration by default have on the openness of the decision-making process on Wikimedia projects?

Potential Costs

  • Volunteer or paid developer effort
  • Server and energy costs
  • Distraction from editing for some users
  • More new users who treat Wikimedia sites solely as social sites rather than collaborative knowledge projects
  • More work for administrators and other community members to ensure the new tools are not being abused

References

Community Discussion

Do you have a thought about this proposal? A suggestion? Discuss this proposal by going to Proposal Talk:Real-time chat.

Want to work on this proposal?

  1. .. Sign your name here!