Proposal:To build a well formed wiki markup language
The status of this proposal is:
Request for Discussion / Sign-Ups
Every proposal should be tied to one of the strategic priorities below.
Edit this page to help identify the priorities related to this proposal!
- Achieve continued growth in readership
- Focus on quality content
- Increase Participation
- Stabilize and improve the infrastructure
- Encourage Innovation
Many wiki markup language are not "well formed"; this is a major problem in any automation issue. A step-by-step revision of wiki markup is suggested.
Advantages of a well formed, xml-like language are well known; it's an excellent mean to split formats and contents, and makes much easier to apply a different format to contents. Alternatives to present, usual markup language are already running and optional (i.e. use of <b>...</b> tags instead of '''...''' code), some are very difficult to implement (i.e. template code).
A step-by-step way could be:
- step I: to extend and encourage use of existing alternatives into Help pages
- step II: to convert not well formed tags into the well formed tags in user input;
- step III: to erase from help pages not well formed options;
- stel IV: to disable not well formed options.
Lots of evidence favours well formed languages, as XML adventure teaches. Persistent troubles with Book tool are mainly a result of not well formed tags IMHO.
Template conversio into a well formed structure is really difficult task I presume... Simplest cases are easy, but general conversion is a terrible challenge. Alex brollo 13:08, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Do you have a thought about this proposal? A suggestion? Discuss this proposal by going to Proposal talk:To build a well formed wiki markup language.
Want to work on this proposal?
- .. Sign your name here!