- Thanks to you. Happy to see someone interessed by this idea ^_^ ~ Seb35 [^_^] 19:06, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Some proposals will have massive impact on end-users, including non-editors. Some will have minimal impact. What will be the impact of this proposal on our end-users? -- Philippe 00:07, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
- It could have a minimal impact for normal users who have a well-known browser, but it could increase the number of end-users for blind users or users which the browser isn't common (Opera for instance).
- In my mind, I thought to a accessibility committee and not a usability committee, whose the mission is technical. But the two notions could also be merged together (although the usability is really better since the Usability Initiative). ~ Seb35 [^_^] 21:03, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
To my mind enhanced consideration(s) require to be given to the persons with disabilities like osteoporosis (sufferrung from arthritis), deaf and dumb and also continued Heart ailment patients utilising internet for more than 5 years. They need to be identified yearwise and number of bites received or applied and they need to be appreciated by airjourney or rail journey concessions to increase the database of internet subscribers.