Proposal talk:WikiSportAlmanach

From Strategic Planning


Some proposals will have massive impact on end-users, including non-editors. Some will have minimal impact. What will be the impact of this proposal on our end-users? -- Philippe 01:13, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wisdom of ever smaller crowds

This strikes me as another proposal to divide wikipedia and thereby create needless bureaucracy as people argue about what should be retained here and what should move, and we wind up with an overlap between the articles on the pedia about the 1952 Olympics and the articles on the new site. If we are missing things like photos the answer is to go find them! WereSpielChequers 13:25, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PD vs. Copyrighted

IANAL, but if it's just plain data (no texts), I don't think it's copyrighted. --Church of emacs 20:15, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]