Proposal talk:Wikipedia Fairness Act

From Strategic Planning


Impact?

Some proposals will have massive impact on end-users, including non-editors. Some will have minimal impact. What will be the impact of this proposal on our end-users? -- Philippe 01:13, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There are a lot of things that certain countries are uncomfortable with. It doesn't mean that it can't be on Wikipedia (because the site is supposed to be uncensored to begin with). GVnayR 02:40, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

rename?

This proposal is very poorly named. I suggest that renaming it "drop the requirements for neutrality and verifiability in biographies of politicians" would be a more accurate description of what it is proposing. WereSpielChequers 15:19, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

seconded, please rename --G.Hagedorn 19:15, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]