| Priority |
Potential Approaches |
| Provide guidance for newer contributors to reduce policy trip-ups and “risk of being bitten” |
- Improve training/mentoring systems for new users
- Provide “in the moment” education and support through new article wizards
- Create tools that simplify and improve access to commonly used features and make it easier to ask for help
|
| Regularly and consistently assess the quality of all articles, systematically identify quality gaps, and prioritize/promote improvement opportunities and requests |
- Introduce automated assessment of article quality and importance
- Introduce the ability for readers to quickly signal issues with article quality
- Alert contributors of articles in need of work that they may be interested in contributing to
|
| Recognize and provide incentives for ongoing quality contributions |
- Implement a reputational system that tracks the quality of contributions and identifies “senior editors”
|
| Facilitate collaboration and coordination around solving problems, resolving disputes and adding value |
- Better leverage technology that enables social ties, affinity groups, and collaboration spaces
- Leverage senior editors
- Introduce new consensus-building processes for disputes that are large and/or repetitive
|
In other languages: English (en) македонски (mk) svenska (sv) português (pt) | Add translation [edit]
