What do we agree on?

I guess we could start by identifying recommendations that tries to achive simmilar goals.

I think for example that all of the following has in common that they wants to bring Wikimedia to the masses (labels taken from the summary on the recommendation page)

• Movement roles - Investing in chapter development
• Movement roles - Establishing a Chapters Network
• Movement roles - Promoting real life events
• Movement roles - Enable nonmembership structures such as university departments to serve in the chapter role
• Movement roles - Enable volunteers to form Regional Working Groups as a sub-Chapter status
• Offline - Schools
• Local Languages - Outreach
• China - Promote the Wikimedia movement and involve the public at large

And the following aims in one way or the other at improving the contributor experience, and to make more potential contributors able to contribute.

• Community health - Volunteer recognition
• Community health - Improve consensus-building processes
• Community health - Demarcate and strengthen volunteer roles
• Community health - Tools for community health
• Community health - Social networking features
• Quality - Global WikiProjects
• Quality - Senior Editors
• Local Languages - Stimulate creation of local content
• Local Languages - Localization and internationalization of the MediaWiki software
• China - Lift the obstacles for participation

Note that each of these recommendations might try to achive other, different goals as well. But I have tried to find the similarities.