Documents from the chapters meeting

Documents from the chapters meeting

For anyone that may be interested - these are the documents that Sue presented today to the chapters meeting in Berlin.

  • Strategy Presentation

Media:Wikimedia Foundation Strategy Project Chapters Presentation 2010.pdf

  • Chapters Market Penetration April 2010

Media:Wikimedia Chapter Market Penetration April 2010.pdf

  • Wikimedia Strategy Plan Summary

Media:Chapters Wikimedia Strategy Plan Summary.pdf

~Philippe (WMF)13:24, 16 April 2010

That was nicely done ;)

I can see the Foundation "interest" for social features again and i feel a real lack of emphasize on ideas that make editors not leaving Wikipedia while getting new editors was well covered.

KrebMarkt07:07, 17 April 2010

Yeah, it's okay if the foundation was planning social features all along, but there wasn't really much attention paid to the broader points of the community health task force. There's a brief mention to consensus building in the appendix. And some vague sense that diversifying our editor base will involve diffusing some of the hostility and arguing.

That said, it's exciting to see things moving forward, and strategy is so much more than what goes on internally on the projects. It's about global politics and economics and technological change. There's only so much room for the details.

What's next?

Randomran16:15, 17 April 2010

The Foundation took all of the recommendations made by the task forces very seriously. The question is, what can it do, and who should do what?

At the end of the day, the Foundation's major lever is the technology, and so it's placing a lot of emphasis on that. Many of the other aspects of things proposed by the Community Health Task Force and others can and should be taken on by others in the movement. One of the goals of this wiki as we move toward the end of this project is figuring out how.

Eekim19:43, 26 April 2010

Would it be useful for the community health task force to try and put together an action plan for the recommendations? I could assemble a decent draft, and try to get some feedback from other people based on what's feasible/agreeable.

Randomran16:59, 27 April 2010

I think this would be wonderful!

Eekim21:18, 27 April 2010

I found some time to put together a draft:

Task force/Community Health/Implementation

Wanted to get some feedback from a few people, including you, before I tried to get more feedback from the village pump. Anything in the implementation plan that seems outlandish, or unclear?

Randomran17:04, 3 May 2010

Thanks for this! We can use this as a model to activate volunteers around the strategic plan as a whole.

I made some changes to your page. First, I merged the Board and Staff columns into one Wikimedia Foundation column. Second, I moved the Volunteers column and made it first. Third, I added a column for Wikimedia Chapters.

The Foundation is already moving to do many of the things in its columns, and we should figure out a nice way to indicate that. Many of the things in both columns could also go under the Chapters column.

Eekim18:24, 3 May 2010

We've got some easy icons:  Doing... and Done for example. I dropped one of them in.

~Philippe (WMF)18:31, 3 May 2010

Thanks guys! You'd know better than I would how to best organize it, so if the line between the foundation and the staff is worth removing then that definitely should be reflected. Not sure what role the chapters will have in the community health recommendations, though. It might make sense for some of the other task forces, but not really for this one. Maybe not thinking it through, though.

BTW, thanks for marking down what's being done. Again, you guys know much more than the rest of us. Feel free to jump in with further changes or criticisms.

Randomran02:50, 4 May 2010

As an aside, I hope the next evolution of strategy wiki will be to organize and activate volunteers. So being able to mark items as Doing and Done will be a critical aspect of this. Philippe has been thinking about how to structure this, and I hope others will join in. Probably Village Pump is a better place for that, although starting the conversation here is fine.

Eekim18:08, 4 May 2010

As much as us volunteers have a decent link to the community, nothing would activate the community as much as Jimbo or other "official" representatives of the foundation. But that kind of call-to-action has to be at the last step, when we're ready to take the recommendations to the end.

At the next step, it makes sense to organize and activate volunteers. But how we do it (and how much) depends on what we're trying to activate them to do.

Randomran19:18, 4 May 2010
 
 

On a basic level I see the chapters as another way for people to connect with each other and they provide alternative methods of communication for users. So, I see it as a way to address some issues related to community health. It also could be a vehicle for WMF volunteers in various wikis to organize in order to better collaborate across wiki or with outside organizations.

FloNight♥♥♥11:21, 4 May 2010

I agree with this. I think outreach in general -- both internally and externally -- is a great role for Chapters to play. The German Wikimedia Chapter gave birth to the idea of Wikipedia Academies, and they could play a great role in distributing swag as well.

Eekim18:06, 4 May 2010

I guess I'm still not clear on what it is that Chapters do. My understanding is that they were just meet-ups for active volunteers. I wasn't aware that they had more/different responsibilities than the rest of us online folks.

Randomran19:20, 4 May 2010

My understanding is that there has been growing interest in better utilizing chapters. This would be maximizing on the areas where they have been successful already, and looking for other ways that they would enhance WMF.

I suggest reading the Chapter reports for a snapshot of their activities.

FloNight♥♥♥19:57, 4 May 2010
 
 
 
 
 

I created a similar table for the local language task force: Task_force/Local_language_projects/Implementation

Dafer4520:19, 4 May 2010
 

Yo, Randomran.

You are really keeping the store running :)

At least we defined what we think that should be implemented. Now whatever it's implemented and how it's implemented is left to each respective wiki.

KrebMarkt06:02, 5 May 2010

Thanks! And I definitely agree that the recommendations need to be general enough that there is room for each project to work out the details. But they also need to be specific enough that they focus on the right priorities.

Randomran14:59, 5 May 2010
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Hoi, I have strong reservations by the presentations.. I blogged about this twice..

The numbers are incomplete and the approach to the data has been biased from the start. This resulted in a presentation that does not consider how the other languages can grow to a size that reflects the number of people who can read / write the language. Thanks,

   GerardM
GerardM13:35, 26 April 2010
 

For those who are interested, the session Philippe mentioned has been summarized (incl discussion) at http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Chapters_meeting_2010/Documentation/Strategy_walkthrough

82.139.85.11513:50, 12 May 2010